<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Streamline News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Integrating Repository Function with Work Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on GWT and iGoogle by Jeff Beauregard</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/igoogle/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Beauregard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=190#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I was just curious what you were using as a metadata generator and where the metadata info was being pulled from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just curious what you were using as a metadata generator and where the metadata info was being pulled from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Sharing Vision by Dawn&#8217;s report from Belfast &#171; Repository News</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/the-sharing-vision/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn&#8217;s report from Belfast &#171; Repository News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=261#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/the-sharing-vision/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/the-sharing-vision/" rel="nofollow">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/the-sharing-vision/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visit from intraLibrary by We have lift-off! What next? &#171; Repository News</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/visit-from-intralibrary/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>We have lift-off! What next? &#171; Repository News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=181#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] For Learning Objects the workflow will be entirely different and, at this stage, I am much less clear how it might work though anticipate it being relatively straightforward as intraLibrary, after all, is a purpose built LO repository.  The work that is being done by the Streamline project will be important here and I am liaising closely with Dawn whose recent blog posts begin to tackle these issues here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For Learning Objects the workflow will be entirely different and, at this stage, I am much less clear how it might work though anticipate it being relatively straightforward as intraLibrary, after all, is a purpose built LO repository.  The work that is being done by the Streamline project will be important here and I am liaising closely with Dawn whose recent blog posts begin to tackle these issues here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search method proposals by GWT and iGoogle &#171; Streamline News</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/search-method-proposals/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>GWT and iGoogle &#171; Streamline News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=195#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] and Mike have built the input and processing elements of the Learning Object search tool, see post here. My job now is to take Mark&#8217;s output and do something visually funky with it. The GWT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Mike have built the input and processing elements of the Learning Object search tool, see post here. My job now is to take Mark&#8217;s output and do something visually funky with it. The GWT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linking to intraLibrary by We have lift-off! What next? &#171; Repository News</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/linking-to-intralibrary/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>We have lift-off! What next? &#171; Repository News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] here and I am liaising closely with Dawn whose recent blog posts begin to tackle these issues here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here and I am liaising closely with Dawn whose recent blog posts begin to tackle these issues here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repository Tools Taster Day by Repository Day &#171; Repository News</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/repository-tools-taster-day/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Repository Day &#171; Repository News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] and thought that we were responsible for developing the interface to intraLibrary itself - see Streamline News - and I&#8217;ll certainly be clearer next time (I&#8217;ll try to post that missing slide soon but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and thought that we were responsible for developing the interface to intraLibrary itself &#8211; see Streamline News &#8211; and I&#8217;ll certainly be clearer next time (I&#8217;ll try to post that missing slide soon but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repository Tools Taster Day by Janet Finlay</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/repository-tools-taster-day/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Finlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hopefully the Belfast Met user group will give the experienced perspective. We could also release a download to the Emerge community?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the Belfast Met user group will give the experienced perspective. We could also release a download to the Emerge community?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on e-framework workshop from John (Heap)&#8230;.. by Janet Finlay</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/e-framework-workshop-from-john-heap/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Finlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-42</guid>
		<description>John - it is - and your post has sparked more discussion than most so has worked in that respect! Important I think to have people seeing both the ups and downs as it helps in achieving better understanding. As someone who wasn&#039;t there it is difficult at the moment to get a proper handle on  the details of what is being proposed - and I suspect from the comments that that is partly because it is still very much &quot;work in progress&quot; and, in that, we hopefully have a role  as stakeholders to influence its development.

I am very pleased though that there is an initiative to take forward the principles of the eFramework and try to make it more accessible to the wider community - at present it clearly is problematic for many of us to use and it is good that this is recognised and being addressed. So I&#039;m very happy for our projects to be guinea pigs in working through these issues - as a great believer in making it easier to share practice effectively I&#039;ll be interested in seeing how this progresses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; it is &#8211; and your post has sparked more discussion than most so has worked in that respect! Important I think to have people seeing both the ups and downs as it helps in achieving better understanding. As someone who wasn&#8217;t there it is difficult at the moment to get a proper handle on  the details of what is being proposed &#8211; and I suspect from the comments that that is partly because it is still very much &#8220;work in progress&#8221; and, in that, we hopefully have a role  as stakeholders to influence its development.</p>
<p>I am very pleased though that there is an initiative to take forward the principles of the eFramework and try to make it more accessible to the wider community &#8211; at present it clearly is problematic for many of us to use and it is good that this is recognised and being addressed. So I&#8217;m very happy for our projects to be guinea pigs in working through these issues &#8211; as a great believer in making it easier to share practice effectively I&#8217;ll be interested in seeing how this progresses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on e-framework workshop from John (Heap)&#8230;.. by johnheap</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/e-framework-workshop-from-john-heap/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>johnheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-41</guid>
		<description>OK, folks.   Seems people think I have been &#039;negative&#039;.  But I thought the point of blogging was to post personal comments on issues ... and to do so in a timely manner. 

I certainly agree with Janet that - if it works - the Innovation Base will be a valuable resource.  (If I was still being negative, I might think that a sledgehammer is being used to crack a nut.)  For now, I will content myself with saying ... thanks (genuinely) for all the comments ... and I will reflect on my original posting in the light of them. Oh, and I applaud the JISC/Emerge communities for taking the technology forward in innovative and interesting ways.  As I said in the earlier post, time will tell if the approach used is appropriate - but I recognise the need to move onwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, folks.   Seems people think I have been &#8216;negative&#8217;.  But I thought the point of blogging was to post personal comments on issues &#8230; and to do so in a timely manner. </p>
<p>I certainly agree with Janet that &#8211; if it works &#8211; the Innovation Base will be a valuable resource.  (If I was still being negative, I might think that a sledgehammer is being used to crack a nut.)  For now, I will content myself with saying &#8230; thanks (genuinely) for all the comments &#8230; and I will reflect on my original posting in the light of them. Oh, and I applaud the JISC/Emerge communities for taking the technology forward in innovative and interesting ways.  As I said in the earlier post, time will tell if the approach used is appropriate &#8211; but I recognise the need to move onwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on e-framework workshop from John (Heap)&#8230;.. by Janet Finlay</title>
		<link>http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/e-framework-workshop-from-john-heap/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Finlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streamlinenews.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Thanks all - agree with John (G) that we need more discussion on the issues here and with John (H) that he may just be being curmudgeonly! From what I can glean (mainly from blog posts - is there an &quot;official&quot; summary of the workshop and Project X for those of us who couldn&#039;t make it?) - the proposed Innovation Base has the potential to be a hugely useful resource for all of us undertaking projects. I know one of the biggest headaches in bidding is being able to trace and assimilate all the related previous projects on a given topic. Anything that helps support that process has to be a good thing. Looking forward to hearing more about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all &#8211; agree with John (G) that we need more discussion on the issues here and with John (H) that he may just be being curmudgeonly! From what I can glean (mainly from blog posts &#8211; is there an &#8220;official&#8221; summary of the workshop and Project X for those of us who couldn&#8217;t make it?) &#8211; the proposed Innovation Base has the potential to be a hugely useful resource for all of us undertaking projects. I know one of the biggest headaches in bidding is being able to trace and assimilate all the related previous projects on a given topic. Anything that helps support that process has to be a good thing. Looking forward to hearing more about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
